Let us remember that, in 2010, when Eni brought the first lawsuit against me for libel and defamation, the company carried out the first attack on my honor and reputation when it presented the “ 2nd version” of my dismissal in the initial petition: So, Eni, in addition to not protecting the whistleblower, as determined by the principles enshrined in its own Code of Ethics, also attacked my honor and reputation with a “false version” of the real reasons for my dismissal, violating international commitments on human rights. As if it were not enough, when being unfairly fired, the Brazilian subsidiary of Eni made me “ miss the chance” of having had a promising career at Petrobras alongside all my honest colleagues who have been there from 2004 until today. “ Apologize” to me and make a significant and proportionate " reparation" for the damages and losses I have suffered in all these more than 21 long years, because, in fact, my name was included in the “ black list” of the Brazilian labor market, “ destroying” my professional career forever and, as a consequence, I lost my “ retirement”. Therefore, Eni will first need to thank me for my " ethical courage" in having followed the words and spirit of Eni's Code of Ethics and recognize that I was the “ whistleblower” (as recognized by the Brazilian labor court), because, in fact, I was “ unfairly” fired by executives, including members of the board of the Brazilian subsidiary of the Respondent in “ retaliation”.įurthermore, in accordance with the corporate commitments and also the international commitments followed and accepted by company, Eni will then need to take the conduct expected by UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, "P rinciples 01 & 02" of the UN Global Compact and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, described in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct: On the other hand, if this “ 3rd version” about my dismissal is the “f alse version”, Eni will need to clarify to your Stakeholders the reasons for the company to conduct my case in the way it was stated (and proven) by me in this post. Now, if this “ 3rd version” about my dismissal is the “ true version”, then I was fired for participating in the millionaire scheme just like all the other employees of illicit behavior involved in the frauds and acts of corruption in the Brazilian subsidiary of Eni and, therefore, I am nothing more than an unscrupulous and opportunistic person because, for more than 21 years, I have been supporting an untrue story to take financial advantage of Eni. So, in my understanding, t his context became the most important fact of our history of more than 21 long years, and should be clarified and proven by me and also by Eni's Board. Therefore, when reading this post, Eni's Board would need to be “ fully convinced” about the truth or falsity of this version about my dismissal. So, in my understanding, this context became the most important fact in this Specific Instance, and should be clarified and proven by the Parties. A very important fact that needs to be noted by Eni's Board in relation to the " 3rd version" about my dismissal presented by the company during the Shareholders' Meeting (AGM 2017).Īnd that's because, there are only two possibilities for the content of Eni's presentation regarding the " 3rd version" of my dismissal: either the version is " true” or the version is " false".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |